Introduction: A misleading debate
Over the long term, only one wins: equities… or commodities?
This is how the debate is usually framed.
Growth versus inflation. Finance versus the real economy.
But this framing is misleading.
The real conflict is not between asset classes.
It is between two fundamental forces:
- liquidity (the monetary system)
- economic reality (physical constraints)
Understanding this distinction changes how you see markets.
1. The illusion: when everything goes up
Over the past decade, an unusual phenomenon has occurred:
almost all asset classes have risen together.
Equities, real estate, commodities.
This is not normal.
It is largely the result of an environment of very low or negative real interest rates, which inflate asset prices by reducing the cost of capital.
When money is cheap:
- future cash flows are overvalued
- risk is compressed
- capital flows into all assets
This creates a powerful illusion:
a world where everything seems to work.
But this situation is inherently unstable.
2. Two cycles, one outcome
Markets are driven by two overlapping cycles.
The short-term cycle (monetary)
- driven by central banks
- based on liquidity
- fast and reversible
The long-term cycle (real)
- energy availability
- demographics
- productivity
- physical constraints
These two cycles can align temporarily.
But they cannot stay aligned forever.
In the short term, everything can rise.
In the long term, one cycle dominates.
3. Inflation as the turning point
Inflation is the mechanism that forces the divergence.
When inflation is low:
- equities perform well
- growth absorbs imbalances
But when inflation becomes persistent:
- purchasing power declines
- margins compress
- monetary conditions tighten
Inflation reduces the real value of future cash flows, which directly impacts financial assets.
At the same time, commodities behave differently.
They are embedded in the real economy:
- they react quickly to supply and demand shocks
- they tend to move with inflation dynamics
Historically, commodity prices have even acted as leading indicators of inflation in many cases .
4. The commodity trap
At this point, it is tempting to conclude:
commodities will win.
That would be too simplistic.
Commodities:
- do not generate cash flows
- are highly cyclical
- depend on economic conditions
They often perform well during inflation spikes, but their long-term returns are inconsistent.
Equities, on the other hand, represent claims on productive assets and have historically benefited from economic growth.
So neither side “always wins.”
5. The real shift: fragility vs antifragility
This is where the framework becomes more powerful.
The real distinction is not between assets.
It is between how they behave under stress.
Fragile assets
- depend on stability
- rely on low interest rates
- suffer from inflation shocks
Examples include:
- long-duration equities
- bonds
Antifragile assets
They benefit from disorder.
Characteristics:
- linked to real constraints
- respond positively to volatility
- gain from imbalance
Commodities fall into this category in certain regimes, particularly during inflationary or supply-driven shocks.
Oil price shocks, for example, have historically played a central role in driving inflation and economic slowdowns .
6. Reframing the debate
The real question is not:
equities vs commodities
It is:
stability vs constraints
- Equities win in a world of abundance, low inflation, and monetary stability
- Commodities win in a world of scarcity, inflation, and structural tension
7. A nuanced but critical thesis
Historically, equities have dominated.
But this dominance relies on a specific environment:
- controlled inflation
- abundant energy
- stable monetary systems
If these conditions change, the outcome can change.
Inflation itself reflects a loss of purchasing power of money , often driven by supply shocks, monetary expansion, or structural imbalances.
In such environments, the relative performance of assets shifts.
The correct conclusion is not:
“equities will lose”
but:
“the regime that allowed equities to dominate is not guaranteed”
Conclusion
Markets can push all assets higher for years.
But in the long run, reality prevails.
- Financial assets perform in stable systems
- Real assets perform in stressed systems
No asset wins in every environment.
The real question is not what to buy.
It is:
what kind of world you are investing in.
Laisser un commentaire